Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delfin Fernandez
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search - The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep when ignoring the anons - CrazyRussian talk/email 18:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Delfin Fernandez[edit]
- Delete Not notable, badly written, not of general interest, does not appear to be a famous person — Preceding unsigned comment added by GuBu (talk • contribs) 10:52, 19 July 2006
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:14, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Keep per WP:BIO, "The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person." Many sources are cited. Subject gets plenty of Ghits (including mention in other news stories not cited here). Article definitely needs cleanup, but being poorly written is not sufficient cause to delete an article. Scorpiondollprincess 13:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete A bodyguard is not important enough to be profiled in an encyclopedia. 86.129.157.213 14:34, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Weak Keep does seem to be just sufficently notable. However, the article is in a terrible state, needs to be written in a more appropriate tense, and needs to sound much less like an advert. MLA 15:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Keep per WP:BIO, "The person has been the primary subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the person." Many sources are cited. Subject gets plenty of Ghits (including mention in other news stories not cited here).Act4 11:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- Delete Vanity page of a bodyguard??? Why was this not a quick delete 81.129.152.69 08:01, 24 July 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No comments:
Post a Comment