User talk:Markintellect

Welcome!

Hello, Markintellect, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --OpenToppedBus - Talk to the driver 09:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

May 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Walt Disney Company has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 10:21, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I left myself logged in on a school computer, and so some people had the temptation to vandalise with my account.

Image copyright problem with Image:LocoRocoScreenshot.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LocoRocoScreenshot.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Brain fitness[edit]

I would love to impose some source discipline on that article. The last time I tried, I ran into conflict with another editor, and efforts to get a third opinion didn't lead anywhere -- since I've always found one-vs-one disputes unsolvable, I gave up on it. If you would be willing to watch the article and give an opinion if issues arise (not necessarily in support of me!), I might be willing to take another shot at it sometime soon. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 18:12, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

anhducwiki7

Monday, April 19, 2021