Talk:1987 Maryland train collision

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Trains (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon
P train.svg
 Trains Portal
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
 
WikiProject Maryland (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

I thought I would add the Rule G in this since this accident did cause the new rule after the major train wreck (I took it out of an old NS rule book which was in effect back in 1985 and the page revised on 5/1/86). TVSRR 03:45, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

"Gunpow interlocking"[edit]

I checked Google to resolve a contradiction in this article. Google has many more hits for "Gunpow interlocking" than "Gunpowder interlocking", but if someone has an original source to confirm "Gunpow," that would be preferable. For now I've changed everything to say just "Gunpow." Yechiel (Shalom) 01:56, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

That is how it is listed in an employee timetable. "Gunpow Interlocking" Ksryengr (talk) 22:03, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Disaster article naming convention[edit]

I propose that this article be moved to 1987 Chase, Maryland train wreck. Highspeed (talk) 22:55, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd suggest 1987 Chase train collision because, firstly, the comma in the title to me looks odd without a consecutive comma after the state (and would look just as odd with one in an article title (and if you need to know that Chase is in Maryland then you'll find that within the article's lead (I know a number of US articles are like this, but since you brought it up...)), and secondly, the event was a collision, whereas 'wreck' is a noun in this instance and this article discusses the whole event and not just the wreckage from the event.  SEO75 [talk] 00:17, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
I agree with the suggestion of 'collision' instead of 'wreck'. But Chase without a state is not so descriptive; how about '1987 Maryland train collision'? This name would more easily identify the event, a collision which is still widely discussed in the railroad industry as it led to mandatory random drug testing of all operating personnel.Highspeed (talk) 00:26, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
As I said, you'd learn that Chase is within Maryland within the article, and there would be more likelihood of there being more than one collision in the state than just the focused area where it occurred (to further drill-down and be more specific). I don't mind '1987 Maryland train collision', however. What did the media typically call it, if that may assist with this? And if the railroad industry use the event as a precedent and still discuss or refer to it, then do they refer to the event as having happened in Chase or just Maryland?  SEO75 [talk] 00:36, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Logical arguments presented here, sir. I believe we are then in agreement with '1987 Maryland train collision'. I am not sure how the media may have addressed it, but in answer to the second question you posed, discussions of this accident refer to it as either being 'the collision in Maryland' or 'the collision in Baltimore' (...back in the eighties). If you are in agreement that we are in agreement, feel free to move the article, or I would be happy to do so after you register your consent here on the talk page. Unless anyone else cares to chime in on this subject, I believe we have come to a reasonable conclusion to title this article more in line with Wiki naming conventions. Highspeed (talk) 06:02, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

December 2008[edit]

  • Also killed in the crash were two sisters from Westerly, RI, Corinne (13 years old) and Kirsten (16 years old) Luce. Their father lost both of his children in this horrific accident that could have been avoided. For 22 years I have been haunted by this accident, and the loss of my friends, Corie and Kirsten, and what bothers me the most is the lack of any mention of their names in any memoriam to the victims of this accident. David Luce lost his entire life on that January day, and a lot of CT and RI residents lost their good friends. Corie and Kirsten, you are not forgotten... it has been 22 years and we are still waiting for you to come home... 71.235.8.13 (talk) 21:08, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Are there any web pages that refer to these victims? If so, please include a reference note when making your edits to the main article. Also, this should be an encyclopedic entry. With all respect, it was not meant to be a 'memorial page'. If it any consolation, this accident resulted in significant changes in how engineers are supervised in performing their job, resulting in the prevention of many similar accidents from ever occurring due to engineer negligence. Highspeed (talk) 01:43, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

October 2009[edit]

  • The PRR originally installed this interlocking plant to control it's 4-track mainline which converged into 2 tracks to cross the Gunpowder River. The PRR constructed the "side" track (as referenced in the article) with an extension that deadended into the Gunpowder River. Amtrak removed that trackage and switch, with the result being the accident described. If the original PRR layout had still been in use, the light Conrail consist would have continued straight and harmlessly derailed on the riverbank. 71.38.151.117 (talk) 06:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)

Marijuana statement not relevant to article[edit]

The citation previously used for the "completely irrelevant" assertion does not support the statement with regard to this article's subject matter. It has been removed and replaced with a "citation needed" note. --KJRehberg (talk) 21:40, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

The statement has been removed. --KJRehberg (talk) 21:44, 29 March 2010 (UTC)

Dead link[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:01, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

 Done —Diiscool (talk) 12:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

"Signal passed at danger" terminology[edit]

Ksryengr (talk · contribs) removed the term Signal passed at danger from the infobox, on the rationale that it is only officially correct in the UK. As far as I've seen, other Wikipedia articles on rail accidents use the term to describe the general concept worldwide; can a more experienced editor clarify what the convention is? --SoledadKabocha (talk) 02:42, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 1987 Maryland train collision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☑Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 11:59, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1987 Maryland train collision. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:25, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Article title[edit]

No formal move request at this time, but I would note that US sources almost exclusively refer to this accident as "Chase", usually without qualification. Mackensen (talk) 13:21, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:1987_Maryland_train_collision&oldid=854319470"