Talk:Love Is All Around

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Songs (Rated C-class)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the quality scale.
Checklist icon
 

Fair use rationale for Image:Borito.jpg[edit]

Nuvola apps important.svg

Image:Borito.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Wasn't this song on the album Cellophane? Shouldn't this be mentioned?[edit]

Here is the link to Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Cellophane-Troggs/dp/B0001DMPUY — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jss367 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

D-major?[edit]

'"Love Is All Around" is a song composed by Reg Presley and performed by The Troggs in D-major.' Uh, really? How is the key any kind of relevant information? Especially in the opening sentence? Elcalen (talk) 20:37, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Requested moves[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move the pages, per the discussion below. I'd note that WP:SONGDAB does not state that songs need to be disambiguated every time songs with identical titles exist, or that we are unable to determine a primary topic for a search request involving song titles; song titles need only be disambiguated when necessary--that is, when there is no primary topic. Our determinations of notability for inclusion are general, but we need not treat all articles as equally vital targets of a given encyclopedic search term. The discussion of evidence here indicates that this article can be taken as the primary topic for the title. Dekimasuよ! 23:06, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


– This song seems more notable than the others, and Wet Wet Wet's version is clearly more well-known than The Troggs', so the title should reflect neutrality at least. Unreal7 (talk) 11:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

  • Comment no objection but I would definitely support making the Troggs song PRIMARYTOPIC on the disambiguation page. Gregkaye ✍♪ 11:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (music), we don't do primary topic for songs when other song articles exist, and this isn't a primary anyway. The comment about Wet Wet Wet and neutrality is odd since a cover version by a recent band hasn't replaced (The Troggs song) in Google Books. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Ehm no, WP:NCM doesn't say "we don't do primary topic for songs when other song articles exist". In that sense we should move Dancing Queen, Welcome to the Jungle or ...Baby One More Time, all of them undoubtedly primary topics. What NCM says at most is "we don't do primary topic for" '(song)' ambiguous titles where there are at least 2 non-primary topic songs (although exeptions may apply). WP:NCF, which is more organized than WP:NCM, even says that it is allowed to have films to be primary topics: "If a film shares its title with one or more non-film topics on Wikipedia, compare all topics and determine whether one is the primary topic." (The Jazz Singer (disambiguation)). If we compare "all 'Love Is All Around' topics" this song is the primary topic. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 10:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
      • Exactly. I'm very surprised at the claim that we don't do primary topic for songs when other song articles exist, that seems completely at odds with our policies and practices. Andrewa (talk) 18:40, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support, per my comment above. © Tbhotch™ (en-2.5). 10:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose. As IIO says, for music we don't use the beauty contest that is primary topic for several reasons, because notability relates to genre, ear of the beholder, age of the listener and the continual reuse of titles. I note that 6 months ago there was an editor moving songs around in accordance with, and quoting WP:SONGDAB, so much so that I made a point of thanking him for one of those moves. Now where did he go? --Richhoncho (talk) 17:35, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Oppose - There are enough other songs (and works of other types) by the same title that giving this one precedence in the use of the title is unwarranted. Furthermore, my personal experience is that the original version by The Troggs gets more visibility than Wet Wet Wet's cover, which is not to say either of us is objectively correct, but it does demonstrate different people have different perceptions depending on what music discovery and listening sources you rely on. mwalimu59 (talk) 17:20, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
    • Good point. But we're a bit light on evidence either way. Perhaps relist to find some? Andrewa (talk) 18:42, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support "(The Troggs song)" is a misleading disambiguator since most people associate this song with Wet Wet Wet. The other "Love is All Around" songs are not even in same league as this one: 191+277+380<6076 Voice of reason 2 (talk) 15:28, 28 September 2014 (UTC)
  • Support. The other topics even taken together don't come near the fame or significance of the Troggs' classic, which is a garage band standard and has many covers, some of them notable in themselves. Andrewa (talk) 18:37, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
  • No activity on here for almost three weeks now. Is it time to move the page? Unreal7 (talk) 23:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Close it by all means, but there is no consensus to move. --Richhoncho (talk) 15:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
  • Three supports and three opposes. Unreal7 (talk) 20:17, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Love Is All Around. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:46, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Love Is All Around. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:27, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Love_Is_All_Around&oldid=821275971"