This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Is it inappropriate to have two links going to the article of this book's film adaptation? Please make the appropriate change if not. Erik 20:52, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
The tone, structure and grammar of this article are in dire need of attention. I don't have time right now but will attempt to tackle it as soon as possible. --Brideshead 21:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
why so much detail on the woman's fantasies?[edit]
What on earth is the point of including more detail about what turns out in the book to be a false story of abuse than about any other part of the plot? It reads more as a sort of sensationalist back-cover blurb than as a summary. DanB†DanD 17:56, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
It's the shocking nature of the story that gets him captivated, that's why I think it's important. Anyone can add other details of the plot anytime they want, why should we be keeping the article at stub length? Tony 19:32, 17 July 2007 (UTC)Tony
No comments:
Post a Comment