Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samrat Upadhyay
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search - The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was withdrawn - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Samrat Upadhyay[edit]
Procedural nom. Found the article in a substub state on Special:Shortpages. Not sure if it should be deleted or could be rescued, and not sure if the writer is notable.- CrazyRussian talk/email 15:12, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Withdraw - CrazyRussian talk/email 20:10, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. That's really funny to see this up on Wikipedia. I know the guy, which would normally keep me from voting, but he has > 25,000 google hits and a number of books on Amazon, as well as being a notable academic at a major university. I think my vote is without too much bias. Article does need some major cleanup, wikifying and even a little NPOV work though. Irongargoyle 16:34, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Article needs cleaning, but meets notability requirements easily. Nuttah68 19:59, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Navigation menu
Personal tools
- Not logged in
- Talk
- Contributions
- Create account
- Log in
Namespaces
Variants
Navigation
Print/export
Languages
- This page was last edited on 17 July 2006, at 20:10 (UTC).
- Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
No comments:
Post a Comment