Talk:List of Doom source ports
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
The contents of the List of Doom source ports page were merged into List of Doom ports and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Pending revisions[edit]
There's a consensus amongst community members to move information about particular Doom source ports into new sections in this article, linking to the appropriate Doom Wiki articles for in-depth info. I will be merging portions of source port articles into this article in a steady fashion for the next few days.--QuasarTE 16:08, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
Fair enough[edit]
Essentially, I welcome the deletion of separate references made to the Doom source ports. A sentiment that is brought about as a result of the incredibly stupid Disneyland patching made by some long standing members of the Zdaemon Forum, for example, and individual aggrandizement that littered the article. Brigand 02:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Links[edit]
Should we provide links the each doom source port's homepage? I think so. --Ysangkok 16:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
I think that providing links to each source's homepage would allow people to visit,and would create prospective members per port. Catman847 14:59, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Free software[edit]
I recently noticed the free software tag was added to the article. However there is one port on the article that is listed as closed, what should we do to fix that? RTC Marine (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Sources[edit]
Okay, I think 3 years is long enough. I'm going to start removing source ports listed here that do not cite reliable secondary sources, per WP:V policy. I will of course attempt to find such sources first. Marasmusine (talk) 13:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Since no-one has replied, or provided any sources, I will begin removing unverified material today. Marasmusine (talk) 11:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
ZDaemon[edit]
Where is ZDaemon info? It's top2 now with Skulltag (dunno which is more popular). Manslay (talk) 05:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
- If you can find some information from reliable, independent source, then we can put it in. Marasmusine (talk) 08:02, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on List of Doom source ports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015105126/http://www.idsoftware.com/iphone-doom-classic-progress/ to http://www.idsoftware.com/iphone-doom-classic-progress/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theintraclinic.com/stark/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.wildpalm.co.uk/doom7650.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:33, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Doom source ports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120206185117/http://dsdoom.com/ to http://dsdoom.com/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402162838/http://www.doomworld.com/classicdoom/ports/index.php?platform=7 to http://www.doomworld.com/classicdoom/ports/index.php?platform=7
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:18, 25 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on List of Doom source ports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.visi.com/~xevious/mamed/readmed.htm - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://forums.se-nse.net/topic/48785-sedoom/page__p__660601%26 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120120064629/http://koti.mbnet.fi/mertama/downloads.html to http://koti.mbnet.fi/mertama/downloads.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170330173755/https://www.chocolate-doom.org/wiki/index.php/Chocolate_Doom to https://www.chocolate-doom.org/wiki/index.php/Chocolate_Doom/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:23, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Doomseeker[edit]
Doomseeker actually supports or has supported a wide variety of Doom source ports: Skulltag, Odamex, SRB2, Chocolate Doom, Zandronum, etc. It's not just Zandronum; Zandronum's download page offering a bundled installer download with Doomseeker doesn't make it any more relevant to Zandronum itself. It's also not notable enough to deserve a mention, so I've removed the mention of Doomseeker from this list article. 84.250.17.211 (talk) 21:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
k8vavoom[edit]
yes, it is a self-promotion. so what? does it make original Vavoom project more alive, or k8vavoom worser, or changing the fact that k8vavoom is the only one alive Vavoom fork? i don't care about downloads, it won't earn me a dime. but i do care about Vavoom, and wanted to emphasise that Vavoom is not dead, and its development goes on. that was the reason i didn't wrote alot about k8vavoom features, and didn't created the separate section for it -- because k8vavoom is simply "Vavoom continued". anyway, i don't plan to start reverting war, and i will not come back here (so don't bother answering if you're expecting me to read it). it is up to you to decide if you value strawman fight with my "self-promotion" more than the actual information about current Vavoom state. 78.152.169.8 (talk)
No comments:
Post a Comment