Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eight On The Break
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search - The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:48, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Eight On The Break[edit]
Borderline spam. We had a place like this near us that stayed open for about a year. I don't know that it warranted an encyclopedia article. Discuss... --Xrblsnggt 01:41, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless this claimed notariety can be proven... -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 01:50, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete utterly non-notable. Dlyons493 Talk 01:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, it's a pool hall. Not much else, it seems. Kuru talk 03:13, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom -- Alias Flood 03:20, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Local establishment, no notability. —C.Fred (talk) 03:57, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. As a Bemani enthusiast, I can say that this arcade is somewhat notable to the Bemani community, but it isn't really notable outside of it. Fails WP:CORP. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 08:22, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no evidence that they pass WP:CORP, and no reliable sources Kevin 10:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete disagree with the nominator, though. The border of Spam does not like smack dab in the middle of spam, where this resides. WilyD 13:09, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and above. SynergeticMaggot 19:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- INCREDIBLY reluctant delete I have only been there twice, but I love The Break. My ex-girlfriend (who is currently one of my best friends) is hugely into Bemani, and she took me there, and it was glorious. Unfortunately, as much as I adore this wonderful establishment, The Break is simply not notable enough to be included in Wikipedia. -- Kicking222 22:02, 19 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No comments:
Post a Comment