User talk:217.208.25.18

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Hallelujah. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Peripitus (Talk) 11:12, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

HALLELUJAH!![edit]

Acctually, it is true that "hallelujah" is used, repeatedly so, to mock and/or provoke certain persons, statements and/or religions. The very fact that you called it "vandalism" was proof enough that you feldt offended by it, and that way further proved my theory... If you could kindly reattach my "vandalism" to Hallelujah's history (I'd hate to do it again), with or without the bad grammars, I would kindly overlook your narrowness for this once and, from me to you: HALLELUJAH!! (<Note that I'm mocking you with this statement *grins*) PS. I'm neither unfair nor negative... I'm just suporting the fact that, the truth should be shown to the public for what it is, with it's entire hideous revelation. Don't try to hide the fact that the truth is a rather hideous thing. ('I', myself, should be proof enough to that.)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.208.25.18 (talkcontribs) 21:09, 18 July 2006

True ? Possibly, but your text Hallelujah" is also, frequently, used to mock or provoke said religions (the fact that this is the 10th time i write this should be proof enough that it works). does not belong in an encyclopediac article. You've added this many times and had at least five different editors remove it. Can you please read the section on verifyability, reliable sources and consensus. Unless you can source the edit and write in a neutral way it will be quickly removed by other editors again and again and again etc... - Peripitus (Talk) 12:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)